JTB and the agnostic

You have given no justification for any of those opinions. You are up to your old rascally ways again, I think.

And your claim that I have no knowledge of the goat-herders' guide to the galaxy is inaccurate. I a simply fail to be impressed, or swayed, by its uncompelling arguments.

Everything I said has been proven. Including your ignorance of the. Bible.

No it has not.   And we are still waiting for some proof that Lot's wife was turned into a pillar of salt for the crime of annoying Yahweh.   The Goat-herders' Guide does not count as proof just because you believe in it.

I just want to be clear here...are you claiming that you did not present evidence from a man who taught himself Hebrew and then wrote his own lexicon? A lexicon that was laughed at by Hebrew scholars.

Is it your statement that you did not present, as evidence, a blog written by a young woman whose main interest was abandoned roller coasters (or theme parks).

Also are you claiming that you never submitted a piece by a home school mom, who never finished college, as evidence?

And finally, is it your position that you did not state that Johnathan Wells, Senior Fellow at the Discovery Institute, supports evolution at some level?

You are clearly in one of your extreme curmudgeon moods today. I am getting ready for a BBQ and have no time to deal with your moaning right now. But I shall be back. Just don't hold your breath awaiting my return.

I’m in the mood for honesty. I’ll be waiting for you to honesty answer my questions that validate my justified true beliefs. My hopes are not real high though.

For a belief to be justified, the first criterion is that it is true. We have no compelling case to suggest your belief is true. And in any case the justification is made by the believer. not some third party.

So you don’t want to answer my questions.

Good lordy, no: they are little more than thinly disguised insults.

No, they are not insults. They are claims you have made that are thinly disguised as facts.

When you climb off that high horse, may be we might have a meaningful discussion/

Let’s have a meaningful conversation concerning the claims you have made. For starters let’s look at your claim that Johnathan Wells supports evolution at some level. Where is your evidence for that? Now, you can’t use home school moms or theme park bloggers as experts.

I never attempted to put words into anyone's mouth but simply relaying words from the institute's own web page:

"House sparrows have adapted to the climate of North America, mosquitoes have evolved in response to global warming, and insects have evolved resistance to our pesticides. These are all examples of microevolution — evolution on a small scale."

They do go on to denounce macroevolution, but I never said they didn't.

Please share that link because I’m not finding this on their wed site

If you google it you might be lucky.

I did google it. It came up on coursehero.com, https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolution-101/microevolution/ and quizlet.com. But nothing on the Discovery Institute’s web site. So please post the link so I can read it for myself